From The Sip Trunking Experts

TMCNet:  Lawmakers eye tax on Internet sales

[April 19, 2009]

Lawmakers eye tax on Internet sales

BOSTON, Apr 19, 2009 (The Sun - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- As state politicians ponder raising the sales tax, gas tax or income tax to counter a deepening financial crisis, hundreds of millions in revenue are disappearing into cyberspace each year.

Bay State consumers typically pay a 5 percent sales tax on most purchases made in the Commonwealth, be it a new plasma television or a set of golf clubs. But as lawmakers consider raising this to 6 percent to generate an extra $750 million, more than $500 million could be going uncollected on items bought online by residents at sites like

Changing the way retailers tax online purchases will require action at both the state and federal level. Faced with bleak alternatives, however, state lawmakers are being forced to look closely at Internet sales and are calling on their colleagues in Washington to do the same.

Online retailers are exempt from charging sales taxes in states where they do not have a physical presence, thanks to a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court ruling known as Bellas Hess v. Illinois.

The ruling was later upheld in 1992 in a similar case, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. The court cited the burden on mail and Internet companies of having to comply with complex, varied tax codes from state to state.

"Our members, Massachusetts brick-and-mortar retailers, compete every day with both the Internet and New Hampshire. We're not ones to go out and advocate for more taxes, but if we're going to tax a product, we want to see a level playing field," said Bill Rennie, vice president of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts.

At least seven states, including California, Indiana and Minnesota, have challenged this by passing laws requiring national chains like Border Books that operate both online and brick-and-mortar stores to charge sales tax online. Courts in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Connecticut, however, have ruled against such laws in those states.

The Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Tennessee has estimated that states lost as much as $30 billion in 2008 because they were not able to collect taxes on remote sales, with Massachusetts losing as much as $539 million.

New York became the first state in 2008 to take on Internet-only companies like Amazon, passing a law that says Web retailers must collect taxes if they have sales affiliates in the state who generate at least $10,000 from the retailer. Affiliates are defined as individuals or companies who are paid a commission for linking to the retailer's Web site. New York's law is being challenged in court.

Technically, Massachusetts residents are required to pay "use taxes" on purchases made online at the end of the year, but forcing people to comply with this statute has proven difficult.

"You just can't collect use taxes. It's impossible," said Scott Peterson, executive director of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project.

The Streamlined Sales Tax Project is a multi-state compact, organized through the National Governor's Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures. It seeks to get states to create uniform sales tax codes, to spur Congress to pass a law overturning the Supreme Court and requiring all retailers to collect and remit sales taxes to the state's where their products are delivered.

The compact does not specify tax rates, but requires states to agree on reporting methods and definitions, such as whether a marshmallow is a general food or candy. It also prohibits price thresholds like the one Massachusetts uses on clothing, when the tax is only applied to clothing costing more than $175.

So far, 22 states have reformed tax codes and joined the compact, with Wisconsin on track to join next month.

In Massachusetts, lawmakers have shown interest in joining the compact and even participated in drafting the regulations of the SSTP, but have yet make the necessary reforms to the state's tax codes. A special corporate tax committee that studied the issue voted 14-1 in 2007 to support implementation here.

"It's really not going to work unless it's uniform and the federal government takes action. But I would expect a vote to join sometimes this year," said Sen. Steve Panagiotakos, a Lowell Democrat who chairs Senate Ways and Means.

The Department of Revenue estimates that the state could collect up to $15 million more in sales taxes immediately. DOR Commissioner Navjeet Bal has drafted a report for the Legislature to consider this year.

"It can be implemented if the Legislature wants to do it," said Robert Bliss, a spokesman for the DOR.

Sen. Richard Moore, an Uxbridge Democrat, and Rep. Mark Falzone, a Saugus Democrat, are leading the charge on Beacon Hill, where momentum seems to gaining as lawmakers look to squeeze every penny out of the current tax system.

Moore introduced and helped pass a resolution in the Senate earlier this calling on Congress and the state's 12-member delegation to support the Main Street Fairness Act, a federal law that would require the all online retailers to collect sales taxes.

The lead sponsor of the bill in the U.S. House of Representatives has been Rep. William Delahunt, a Quincy Democrat.

Moore has also filed legislation to bring Massachusetts in line with the regulations agree upon in the SSTP, and Falzone has done the same in the House.

Nine state lawmakers signed on to Moore's resolution this session, including Rep. Cory Atkins, a Concord Democrat. Many more interviewed support the idea.

House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Murphy, a Burlington Democrat, signaled his willingness to study the issue just this week in an editorial board meeting with Sun reporters and editors.

"We want Massachusetts to become a member because they will have a better sales tax system, and all Congress has to do is say these state's have done enough work to require retailers to collect sales taxes," Peterson said.

To see more of The Sun, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to Copyright (c) 2009, The Sun, Lowell, Mass. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For reprints, email, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

[ Back To SIP Trunking Home's Homepage ]

Subscribe here for your FREE
SIP TRUNKING enewslettter.

Featured Partner

Featured Whitepapers

SIP Security for the Enterprise
Voice over IP (VoIP) is incorporated into a variety of computer networks, both public and private, and used for everyday transactions and communications among carriers, businesses, government agencies...

Making A Broadband Purchase Decision
Businesses today have many options for broadband connectivity. Clarifying your particular business needs prior to selecting a broadband provider will ensure an optimal match of broadband service to your requirements.

Voice-Optimized Network Delivers Premier Call Experience
Customers equate call quality with business quality. Real-time communication, interpersonal interaction, and the cordial tone of a call center representative can create a positive impression of your business that no email can match.

Featured Case Studies

Business Telecom Expenses Reduced 50%
A small to medium sized company in the midwest was interested in migrating to IP Communications, but in today's economy, they were hesitant to upgrade their communication system due to their perception that the cost would outweigh the benefits.

Multi-State Company Cuts Telecom Costs 50%
A multi-site, multi-state company with extensive monthly long distance fees and toll-free charges did not have adequate broadband for Broadvox SIP Trunking requirements, nor did they have a SIP enabled telephone system.

Discover Leisure Connects Remote Users to its IP-PBX
Discover Leisure is one of the largest resellers of caravans and motor homes in the UK. With 15 branch of?ces all over the country, the company spent a great deal of money every month just on internal phone calls.

Featured eBOOKS

Internet+: The Way Toward Global Unified Communication
Connecting the telephony of the enterprise PBX or Unified Communications (UC) system using SIP trunks instead of conventional telephone lines has been very successful in recent years.

What is SIP Trunking? Edition 2
SIP trunking is becoming more of a focus for service providers. One key issue many service providers face when deploying SIP trunks is NAT, or Network Address Translation, traversal.

What is SIP Trunking? Edition 1
A vast resource for information about all things SIP - including SIP, security, VoIP, SIP trunking and Unified Communications.

Featured Videos

Broadvox VAR Testimonial VAR 1:
Part 1 of the VAR (Value Added Reseller) Partner Program Testimonials for Broadvox...

E-SBCs AS The Demarcation Point:
Ingate's Steve Johnson talks to Erik Linask about the role session border controller plays as the demarcation point at...

Demystifying DPI
How can deep packet inspection protect your SIP traffic as well as your entire network?

Featured Resources

Partner Program Overview:
Over 4,000 VARs, Master Agents, Solution Providers, and Independent IT Professionals trust Broadvox. We offer customized services and solutions to fit seamlessly into any company's business model. And when you partner with Broadvox, every member of our team stands behind you and your customers 100%...

SIP Trunk UC Summit

What's New

Presenting the New Ingate/Intertex Website:
Internet+ is an extended Internet access allowing high quality SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) based real-time person-to-person communication, everywhere and for any application. It applies to both fixed and mobile networks ...

Featured Blogs

Featured Webinars

Secure SIP Trunking:
What You Need to Know

Successfully Deploying Enterprise SIP Trunking:
Tools and Techniques for Overcoming Common Roadblocks

Featured Podcasts

Getting the Most Out of Your SIP Trunks:
Ingate's Steve Johnson and TMC's Erik Linask discuss how best practices forgetting the most out of SIP Trunking services and common pitfalls to avoid.

Featured Datasheets

Ingate SIParator E-SBCs
Adopting SIP is a simple process with the Ingate SIParator, the secure enterprise session border controller (E-SBC). The SIParator makes secure SIP communications - including VoIP,SIP trunking and more - possible while working seamlessly with your existing network firewall.

Ingate Firewalls
Everyone is talking about enterprise usage of VoIP, instant messaging and other types of realtime communications including presence and conferencing.

SIP Trunk Solutions for Service Providers
The award-winning Ingate Firewall and Ingate SIParator deliver a high quality, reliable SIP trunk connection between the customer's IP-PBX and the service provider network, and solve interoperability issues to simplify deployments and support for remote diagnosis of reported issues.