INGATE

From The Sip Trunking Experts

TMCNet:  Levin, Rangel to USTR: Consider Designating China 'Priority Foreign Country' for Alleged Trade Secrets Theft

[March 29, 2013]

Levin, Rangel to USTR: Consider Designating China 'Priority Foreign Country' for Alleged Trade Secrets Theft

(Targeted News Service Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) WASHINGTON, March 28 -- The Ranking Democratic Member of the House Ways and Means Committee issued the following news release: Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Sander Levin (D-MI) and Trade Subcommittee Ranking Member Charles Rangel (D-NY) have sent a letter to Acting United States Trade Representative Demetrios Marantis urging USTR to consider designating China a Priority Foreign Country as evidence mounts that China actively engages in the cyber theft of the trade secrets of American businesses.


The Trade Act of 1974 requires USTR to identify those countries that deny adequate and effective protection for intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market access for persons that rely on IPR protection.

Countries that have the most onerous or egregious acts, policies, or practices and whose acts, policies or practices have the greatest adverse impact in relevant U.S. products generally must be designated as "priority foreign countries" (PFC). The annual USTR process of assessing countries' IPR practices is referred to as the "Special 301" process, and it results in a report issued April 30 of each year.

Under the statute, within 30 days after a PFC is designated, USTR generally must initiate a Section 301 investigation, which ultimately can lead to the President taking "appropriate action" such as the imposition of additional import duties. If USTR determines that the act, policy, or practice is unjustifiable and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce (or violates a U.S. trade agreement), the USTR is required to take action. In the case of a WTO violation, that action generally involves bringing a WTO case.

A PDF copy of the letter is here.http://democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrats.waysandmeans.house.

gov/files/27March2013_China%20Special%20301%20Letter%20%282%29.pdf
Text of the letter is below: Dear Ambassador Marantis, As the deadline for publishing the results of the 2013 Special 301 Review approaches, and as evidence mounts that the Government of China actively engages in the cyber theft of the trade secrets of American businesses, we write to request that you consider designating China as a Priority Foreign Country under Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974.

While the theft of trade secrets is not new, cyber theft is on the rise, and it allows trade secrets to be stolen on an unprecedented scale. In February of this year, Mandiant, an information security firm, published a report that linked cyber theft of trade secrets to the Government of China.

Mandiant identifies a cyber theft organization staffed by hundreds, if not thousands, of people. Since 2006, the organization - which has adopted a variety of personas, including "Ugly Gorilla" - has compromised 141 companies in 20 major industries. It steals technology blueprints, proprietary manufacturing processes, test results, business plans, pricing documents, and partnership agreements. Once it infiltrates a victim's network, it is able to maintain access for nearly a year, sometimes more.

Mandiant estimates that the organization has stolen 6.5 terabytes of data from a single organization over a ten-month period.

Mandiant has linked this organization to the Chinese government. The report states that Mandiant's "research and observations indicate that the Communist Party of China is tasking the Chinese People's Liberation Army to commit systematic cyber espionage and data theft against organizations around the world." Mandiant has also established a link to at least one Chinese state-owned enterprise (SOE): China Telecom. It looks very much as though the Chinese government is stealing our companies' trade secrets and passing them along to their SOEs, and possibly other Chinese companies. It is difficult enough for our companies to compete with the endless massive subsidies and other industrial policies of the Chinese government, but add trade secret theft into the mix and it is miraculous that our companies are able to compete at all.

The Administration has taken some commendable steps to address cyber theft.

USTR's inclusion of a discussion of trade secret theft in the 2012 Special 301 Report was an important step forward. The Administration's launch of the Strategy on Mitigating the Theft of U.S. Trade Secrets earlier this year is also welcome. Both of these initiatives lay the groundwork for designating offending governments as priority foreign countries under Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Section 182 requires the U.S. Trade Representative to identify as "priority foreign countries" those countries that have the most onerous or egregious acts, policies, or practices that deny adequate and effective intellectual property rights. Typically, a country denies adequate and effective intellectual property rights by failing to stop private actors from engaging in the theft of intellectual property. China has already failed to take adequate steps to protect against theft of trade secrets. But recent reports take this much further: in the case of China, the government itself appears to be actively stealing the intellectual property of American businesses. And that theft - as well as China's failure to protect against such theft by others in China - appear to be a straightforward violation of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, which requires WTO Members to protect trade secrets.

We have known for some time that the Government of China does not do enough to enforce the intellectual property of U.S. innovators in China. But government-sponsored theft of trade secrets would put China in an entirely different category. Given the evidence of this egregious conduct, the corresponding damage to our businesses, and the fact that China is in breach of its WTO obligations, we urge you to consider designating China a Priority Foreign Country for Special 301 purposes.

Sincerely, Sander M. Levin Charles B. Rangel TNS CT21CT-130329-4269817 61ChengTacorda (c) 2013 Targeted News Service

[ Back To SIP Trunking Home's Homepage ]

Loading
Subscribe here for your FREE
SIP TRUNKING enewslettter.

Featured Partner


Featured Whitepapers

SIP Security for the Enterprise
Voice over IP (VoIP) is incorporated into a variety of computer networks, both public and private, and used for everyday transactions and communications among carriers, businesses, government agencies...

Making A Broadband Purchase Decision
Businesses today have many options for broadband connectivity. Clarifying your particular business needs prior to selecting a broadband provider will ensure an optimal match of broadband service to your requirements.

Voice-Optimized Network Delivers Premier Call Experience
Customers equate call quality with business quality. Real-time communication, interpersonal interaction, and the cordial tone of a call center representative can create a positive impression of your business that no email can match.

Featured Case Studies

Business Telecom Expenses Reduced 50%
A small to medium sized company in the midwest was interested in migrating to IP Communications, but in today's economy, they were hesitant to upgrade their communication system due to their perception that the cost would outweigh the benefits.

Multi-State Company Cuts Telecom Costs 50%
A multi-site, multi-state company with extensive monthly long distance fees and toll-free charges did not have adequate broadband for Broadvox SIP Trunking requirements, nor did they have a SIP enabled telephone system.

Discover Leisure Connects Remote Users to its IP-PBX
Discover Leisure is one of the largest resellers of caravans and motor homes in the UK. With 15 branch of?ces all over the country, the company spent a great deal of money every month just on internal phone calls.

Featured eBOOKS

Internet+: The Way Toward Global Unified Communication
Connecting the telephony of the enterprise PBX or Unified Communications (UC) system using SIP trunks instead of conventional telephone lines has been very successful in recent years.

What is SIP Trunking? Edition 2
SIP trunking is becoming more of a focus for service providers. One key issue many service providers face when deploying SIP trunks is NAT, or Network Address Translation, traversal.

What is SIP Trunking? Edition 1
A vast resource for information about all things SIP - including SIP, security, VoIP, SIP trunking and Unified Communications.

Featured Videos

Broadvox VAR Testimonial VAR 1:
Part 1 of the VAR (Value Added Reseller) Partner Program Testimonials for Broadvox...

E-SBCs AS The Demarcation Point:
Ingate's Steve Johnson talks to Erik Linask about the role session border controller plays as the demarcation point at...

Demystifying DPI
How can deep packet inspection protect your SIP traffic as well as your entire network?

Featured Resources

Partner Program Overview:
Over 4,000 VARs, Master Agents, Solution Providers, and Independent IT Professionals trust Broadvox. We offer customized services and solutions to fit seamlessly into any company's business model. And when you partner with Broadvox, every member of our team stands behind you and your customers 100%...

SIP Trunk UC Summit

What's New

Presenting the New Ingate/Intertex Website:
Internet+ is an extended Internet access allowing high quality SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) based real-time person-to-person communication, everywhere and for any application. It applies to both fixed and mobile networks ...

Featured Blogs

Featured Webinars

Secure SIP Trunking:
What You Need to Know

Successfully Deploying Enterprise SIP Trunking:
Tools and Techniques for Overcoming Common Roadblocks

Featured Podcasts

Getting the Most Out of Your SIP Trunks:
Ingate's Steve Johnson and TMC's Erik Linask discuss how best practices forgetting the most out of SIP Trunking services and common pitfalls to avoid.

Featured Datasheets

Ingate SIParator E-SBCs
Adopting SIP is a simple process with the Ingate SIParator, the secure enterprise session border controller (E-SBC). The SIParator makes secure SIP communications - including VoIP,SIP trunking and more - possible while working seamlessly with your existing network firewall.

Ingate Firewalls
Everyone is talking about enterprise usage of VoIP, instant messaging and other types of realtime communications including presence and conferencing.

SIP Trunk Solutions for Service Providers
The award-winning Ingate Firewall and Ingate SIParator deliver a high quality, reliable SIP trunk connection between the customer's IP-PBX and the service provider network, and solve interoperability issues to simplify deployments and support for remote diagnosis of reported issues.